by available from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, available from the National Technical Information Service in Oak Ridge, TN, Springfield, VA .
Written in English
|Other titles||Blueprint for consumer protection.|
|Statement||Barbara Reid Alexander.|
|Contributions||United States. Dept. of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information., United States. National Technical Information Service.|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||v, 100 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||100|
Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX Document Object Identifier (DOI): /w Published: Joskow, Paul and Jean Tirole. "Retail Electricity Competition." RAND Journal of Econom 4 (Winter ): Cited by: retail electric competition by a date certain, many other states have initiated regulatory proceedings to explore, and, in some cases, implement, retail competi-tion. In every state that is exploring retail electric competition, legislators, state energy regulators and other state policymakers, business groups, environ-mental and consumer File Size: 2MB. Over the past two decades of retail electric power market experience in the Unites States, three important lessons may help inform other countries contemplating retail restructuring. 1. Stringent market entry rules are essential. Most retail markets have a rigorous certification, licensing, and registration process for retail electricFile Size: KB. Investigation of Pennsylvania’s Retail Electricity Market Docket No I Retail Competition in Texas: Docket No. I- - A Success Story “The mission of the Public Utility Commission of Texas is to protect customers, foster competition, and promote high quality infrastructure.” Chairman Barry T. .
liberalisation of electricity trade is known as “retail competition”. Under retail competition, transactions among generators, end users and a number of possible intermediaries, such as retailers, power exchanges and brokers take place freely (within the “physical” constraints imposed by . Retail competition for industrial and commercial consumers Retail competition for residential customers Municipal aggregation Community Choice Aggregation in Massachusetts and California Default service pricing and the impact on retail competition Retail competition in Illinois I: suppliers and offers Retail File Size: 1MB. Steps to Electric Competition in Texas. () 3. Wholesale competition legislation passed (SB ) May Jan. Retail. competition legislation. Passed (SB 7) June. Sept. ERCOT Electric rates frozen. Jan. July Texas Choice pilot. program. begins. Affiliate REPs allowed to offer non-price File Size: 2MB. Books at Amazon. The Books homepage helps you explore Earth's Biggest Bookstore without ever leaving the comfort of your couch. Here you'll find current best sellers in books, new releases in books, deals in books, Kindle eBooks, Audible audiobooks, and so much more.
Regulators considered retail electric competition years ago, but debates "stalled out" in , according to the Arizona Capitol Times. Olson has made headlines since joining the . Electric choice participation remained slightly above 10% for each utility and there continues to be approximately 6, queued customers statewide. To date, Michigan remains one of 20 states that had full or limited restructuring of the competitive electric market. Form more information, see the MPSC’s Status of Electric Competition Report. Competition and Consumer Protection Perspectives on Electric Power Regulatory Reform: Focus on Retail Competition Competition and Consumer Protection Perspectives on Electric Power Regulatory Reform: Focus on Retail Competition Executive Summary In the 's, both the federal government and the states sought to spur competition in. Electricity choice is available in Michigan. However, under state law, no more than 10% of an electric utility’s average weather-adjusted retail sales for the preceding calendar year may take electric choice service from an alternative electric supplier at any time. If your utility’s 10% cap is fully subscribed, you will be placed in its queue.